WILLIAM H. GOODFRIEND, APPELLANT,
v.
ELBERT J. DRUCK AND TRANSIT COMPANY OF THE PALM BEACHES, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEES
WILLIAM H. GOODFRIEND, APPELLANT,
ELBERT J. DRUCK AND TRANSIT COMPANY OF THE PALM BEACHES, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEES
321 So. 2d 120
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1975)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
OWEN, Judge.
Appellant, a judgment debtor of one of the appellees, has filed this interlocutory appeal from an order overruling his objection to certain interrogatories propounded in aid of execution as authorized by Rule 1.560 RCP. While the objection related to questions concerning property held in the name of appellant’s spouse and/or children, the questions propounded do not seek privileged information and are reasonably within the scope of discovery permitted under Rule 1.280(b) RCP. Affirmed.
WALDEN, C. J., and CROSS, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
JIM Appley's Tru-Arc, Inc. v. Liquid Extraction Sys. Ltd. P'ship, 526 So. 2d 177 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)…ry. A judgment creditor should be allowed broad discovery into the debtor’s finances, pursuant to section 56.29(4), Fla.Stat. (1985), and Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.280, even if the discovery concerns property jointly owned with others. See Goodfriend v. Druck, 321 So. 2d 120 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Keystone Trust Co. v. Rockefeller, 118 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960). The trial court’s acceptance of the assertion by the debtor in this case that he had no individually-owned assets, to the best of his knowledge, was inconsis…