MARY S. KUBALSKI, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF LEONARD KUBALSKI, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
v.
SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLEES
MARY S. KUBALSKI, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF LEONARD KUBALSKI, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLEES
321 So. 2d 86
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1975)
Caution
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See, Holton v. City of Bartow, 68 So. 2d 385 (Fla.1953); Avcy v. City of West Palm Beach, 152 Fla. 717, 12 So. 2d 881 (1943); Gordon v. City of West Palm Beach, 4th DCA Fla., 321 So. 2d 78, opinion filed October 10, 1975; Clifton v. City of Ft. Pierce, 4th DCA Fla., 319 So. 2d 195, opinion filed September 12, 1975; City of Tampa v. Davis, 226 So. 2d 450 (2nd DCA Fla.1969); Raven v. Coates, 125 So. 2d 770 (3rd DCA Fla.1961).
WALDEN, C. J., and CROSS and OWEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ellis Richardson v. State, 432 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)…The statutory language infers that there must be an existing ' sentence in that jurisdiction. Cf., Newman v. State, 409 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). Additionally, the date of commencement of a sentence cannot be vague or uncertain. Keel v. State, 321 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). Although appellant had been placed on parole, the New Jersey authorities chose not to prosecute him for his subsequent violation. Thus, no sentence existed for that violation in New Jersey when he was sentenced by the trial court…
-
Percival v. State, 506 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)…hat the trial court erred in requiring his sentences to be served consecutively to a sentence which had not yet been imposed on other charges pending against him. The sentence imposed by a trial court must commence on a definite date, Keel v. State, 321 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975), and may only be required to be served consecutively to an existing sentence. See Richardson v. State, 432 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Teffeteller v. State, 396 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). In this case, the trial court di…
-
McCALL v. State, 475 So. 2d 1364 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)…because it was vague and uncertain as to when it commenced relative to “any additional sentence” in North Carolina. See Richardson v. State, 432 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Teffeteller v. State, 396 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Keel v. State, 321 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). However, the record reflects that defendant began serving his Florida sentence after he served all of his sentences in North Carolina. Thus, the issue has become moot, and no purpose would be served by remanding for entry of a co…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- The City OF Tampa v. Davis, 226 So. 2d 450 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969)
- Gordon v. City OF W. Palm Beach, 321 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)
- Avey v. City OF W. Paim Beach, 152 Fla. 717 (Fla. 1943)
- Alvina Ann Raven and John Raven v. Nancie Boughner Coates and David Owen Coates, 125 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961)
- Holton v. City of Bartow, 68 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 1953)
- Henry v. Clifton and Dorcas Clifton, 319 So. 2d 195 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)