IN RE ESTATE OF FLORETTA VAN HORNE, DECEASED. WALTER SHIKANY, EXECUTOR, PETITIONER,
v.
JOHN C. VAN HORNE AND RICHARD LONGABAUGH, RESPONDENTS; JOHN C. VAN HORNE, PETITIONER, V. WALTER SHIKANY AND RICHARD LONGABAUGH, RESPONDENTS

Fla. | 1975-07-03
Nos. 46568, 46874
ADKINS, C. J., and BOYD, McCAIN, OVERTON and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.
320 So. 2d 388 Florida Supreme Court (1975) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court

Certiorari denied. 305 So. 2d 46.

ADKINS, C. J., and BOYD, McCAIN, OVERTON and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Wehrheim v. Golden Pond Assisted Living Facility, 905 So. 2d 1002 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)
    …her reasons.” [*1009] A prior version of this statute found in section 731.08, Florida Statutes, which is virtually identical to section 723.5165, was applied by the court in In re Estate of Van Horne, 305 So. 2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 320 So. 2d 388 (Fla.1975), wherein the court explained by quoting section 366 of the Wills portion of American Jurisprudence: “... the general rule is that parts of a will may be held valid notwithstanding other parts are invalid on account of undue influence exe…
  • SUN Bank/Miami, N.A. v. Hogarth, 536 So. 2d 263 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
    …re was no relationship between the party exercising the undue influence and the other beneficiary of the influenced instrument. In Re Kiggins’ Estate, 67 So. 2d 915 (Fla.1953); In Re Van Home’s Estate, 305 So. 2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 320 So. 2d 388 (Fla.1975). The evidence indicates that Gray-son’s actions were undertaken not only to benefit himself, but also to benefit Bono-mo. Finally, appellant Sun Bank argues that the trial court lacked jurisdiction over the amended trust agreement, first…
  • Fiel v. Hoffman, 169 So. 3d 1274 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)
    …re was no relationship between the party exercising the undue influence and the other beneficiary of the influenced instrument. In re Kiggins’ Estate, 67 So. 2d 915 (Fla.1953); In re Van Home’s Estate, 305 So. 2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 320 So. 2d 388 (Fla.1975). The evidence indicates that Grayson’s actions were undertaken not only to benefit himself, but also to benefit [his sister]. Id. at 267 (emphasis added). Similarly, the complaint in this case alleges that the actions of Narcy were taken…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw