SALLIE MARTIN MUNROE, APPELLANT,
v.
MARY M. BIRDSEY AND HER HUSBAND, ALBERT H. BIRDSEY, APPELLEES
SALLIE MARTIN MUNROE, APPELLANT,
MARY M. BIRDSEY AND HER HUSBAND, ALBERT H. BIRDSEY, APPELLEES
102 Fla. 543
Florida Supreme Court (1931)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 133 So. 80
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of *544the orders and decrees herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having-been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said orders and decrees; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said orders and decrees of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
A. P. Forcum for Union Bond & Mortg. Co. v. Symmes, 106 Fla. 510 (Fla. 1932)…s Judge of the Circuit Court in the Eleventh Circuit. Both points were disposed of against the contention of the appellees by this court speaking through Mr. Justice BROWN, in a very clear opinion in March, 1931. See Forcum v. Symmes, 101 Fla. 1266, 133 South. Rep. 80. The one error assigned is the order of January 21, 1930, sustaining the demurrers and dismissing the second amended bill. Was the bill vulnerable to the attack made upon it by the demurrers? All defendants demurred except George H. Close. One cal…