CHARLES E. CADDELL AND MARGARET CADDELL, PETITIONERS,
v.
ELAINE B. STELIGA AND STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, RESPONDENTS
CHARLES E. CADDELL AND MARGARET CADDELL, PETITIONERS,
ELAINE B. STELIGA AND STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, RESPONDENTS
318 So. 2d 402
Florida Supreme Court (1975)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Certiorari denied. 308 So. 2d 56.
ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, OVERTON and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Haines v. S. Life & Health Ins. Co., 363 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)…days. We affirm. The appellant concedes that the present law in Florida, articulated by the Second District, would uphold such 90 day limitations. Stinchomb v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, 305 So. 2d 84 (Fla.2d DCA 1974), cert. den., 318 So. 2d 402. In Stinchomb the facts involved a leg amputation which occurred some 73 days beyond the allowable 90 days. As that court said: We cannot blame appellant and his doctor for having delayed the amputation in the vain hope the leg might be saved. How…
Authorities Cited
- Knutson v. AMF, 308 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)