MARSHALL BANKS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MARSHALL BANKS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
626 So. 2d 314
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The written order of the trial court indicates that the defendant’s probation was revoked because he violated four of its terms. The court actually dismissed three of the alleged violations and announced that, the only condition breached was the one requiring him to file monthly reports. We therefore reverse the order and instruct that on remand the trial court conform the written order to its oral pronouncement.
REVERSED.
DELL, C.J., and STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Villanueva v. State, 637 So. 2d 350 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)…king the finding therein that the appellant violated condition number six of his probation; this modification is necessary so as to conform to the trial court’s oral findings at the conclusion of the probation revocation hearing. See Banks v. State, 626 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Hogwood v. State, 615 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Fairman v. State, 576 So. 2d 948 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); King v. State, 451 So. 2d 948 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Affirmed as modified.…