MRS. J. C. FRIER, JOINED BY HER HUSBAND, J. C. FRIER,
v.
MRS. LOLA ALLEN, AND HER HUSBAND L. B. ALLEN, N. H. CONNELL, MRS. STELLA POOLE, AND HER HUSBAND, IRA J. POOLE, MRS. DELLA LANE, AND HER HUSBAND, R. B. LANE, ROY CONNELL, ZONA MAE CONNELL, MRS. ELOISE HANCOCK, AND HER HUSBAND, JESSE HANCOCK, ALBERTA HIERS, MARGARET HIERS, HENRY JAMES HIERS, NEWMAN CONNELL, JR., MRS. NEWMAN CONNELL, MRS. MERTIE M. WASHINGTON, AND HER HUSBAND E. B. WASHINGTON, VIRGINIA WASHINGTON, RUBY NELL WASHINGTON, LAKE PARK BANK, A BANKING CORPORATION EXISTING AND DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA, AT LAKE PARK, GEORGIA, P. W. MCLEOD, I. C. MCLEOD, CLEON MCLEOD, P. R. COPELAND, ROY COPELAND, G. W. COPELAND, C. I. WISENBAKER, J. B. WISENBAKER
MRS. J. C. FRIER, JOINED BY HER HUSBAND, J. C. FRIER,
MRS. LOLA ALLEN, AND HER HUSBAND L. B. ALLEN, N. H. CONNELL, MRS. STELLA POOLE, AND HER HUSBAND, IRA J. POOLE, MRS. DELLA LANE, AND HER HUSBAND, R. B. LANE, ROY CONNELL, ZONA MAE CONNELL, MRS. ELOISE HANCOCK, AND HER HUSBAND, JESSE HANCOCK, ALBERTA HIERS, MARGARET HIERS, HENRY JAMES HIERS, NEWMAN CONNELL, JR., MRS. NEWMAN CONNELL, MRS. MERTIE M. WASHINGTON, AND HER HUSBAND E. B. WASHINGTON, VIRGINIA WASHINGTON, RUBY NELL WASHINGTON, LAKE PARK BANK, A BANKING CORPORATION EXISTING AND DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA, AT LAKE PARK, GEORGIA, P. W. MCLEOD, I. C. MCLEOD, CLEON MCLEOD, P. R. COPELAND, ROY COPELAND, G. W. COPELAND, C. I. WISENBAKER, J. B. WISENBAKER
153 Fla. 480
Florida Supreme Court (1943)
Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 14 So. 2d 901
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause being here on appeal, the order appealed from is affirmed.
It is so ordered.
BUFORD, C. J., BROWN, THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Forrest H. AKE and Mittie AKE v. Birnbaum, 156 Fla. 735 (Fla. 1945)…s where the injured person has not pursued his cause of action to final judgment; and this without regard to whether suit is or is not pending on the cause of action at the time of the injured person’s decease. Any statement in In Re Moore’s Estate, 153 Fla. 480, 15 So. (2nd) 55, that may seem to the contrary are hereby expressly overruled. Moreover, to fully settle the whole issue before us, we think it not inappropriate to observe that under section 45.11 supra, the cause of action of the decedent survive…1 / 3
-
Garner v. Ward, 251 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 1971)…he legislature to establish such classes is not questioned. See Duval v. Hunt, 34 Fla. 85, 15 So. 876 (1894); Benoit v. Miami Beach Electric Co., 85 Fla. 396, 96 So. 158 (1923). Also see Love v. Hannah, 72 So. 2d 39 (Fla.1954); In re Moore’s Estate, 153 Fla. 480, 15 So. 2d 55 (1943); Birdsong v. Henry, 128 So. 2d 404 (Fla.App.2d, 1961); Steffan v. Zernes, 124 So. 2d 495 (Fla.App.lst, 1960). The existence of priorities ordered on family relationships or dependency presupposes the existence of such relationsh…
-
Haverty Furniture Co. v. McKESSON & Robbins, Inc., 154 Fla. 772 (Fla. 1944)…ed and could be maintained by the personal representative of the injured party, except those enumerated in the statute, to wit: assault and battery, slander, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution. In the recent case of In re: Moore’s Estate, 153 Fla. 480, 15 So. (2nd) 55, in which the factual situation was entirely different from that involved here, we held that this statute, 45.11 F.S.A., deals with the abatement by death of actions pending for damages suffered by the plaintiff, and does not author…