ANNABELLE G. BELCHER, PETITIONER,

v.

JOHN A. BELCHER, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• August Urbanek v. Urbanek, 484 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
  …, his obligation for attorney’s fees also ends. Belcher v. Belcher, 271 So. 2d 7 (Fla.1972); Mulhern v. Mulhern, 446 So. 2d 1124 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 455 So. 2d 1033 (Fla.1984); Belcher v. Belcher, 307 So. 2d 918 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 317 So. 2d 762 (Fla.1975). We find, however, that this issue was not properly preserved for appellate review since it was not raised below. See Hartley v. Florida East Coast Railway, 339 So. 2d 630 (Fla.1976). The husband never contested in the trial court his lia…
• State v. Jones, 425 So. 2d 178 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
  …g also heard and ruled on the probation revocation charge. . A probation revocation hearing is a sentencing function, not a trial. Brill v. State, 159 Fla. 682, 32 So. 2d 607 (1947); Young v. State, 305 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1974), cert. den. 317 So. 2d 762 (Fla. 1975); McNeely v. State, 186 So. 2d 520 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1966). Jeopardy occurs when a person is put upon trial under an indictment or information sufficient in form and substance to sustain a conviction before a court of competent jurisdiction,…
• Augustin Fernandez v. Miami Jai-Alai, Inc., 454 So. 2d 1060 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
  …er Investigative Agency, Inc. v. Scott, 394 So. 2d 559 (Fla. 3d DCA), pet. for review denied, 402 So. 2d 609 (Fla.1981); Hernandez v. Motrico, Inc., 370 So. 2d 836 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Doll v. Robbins, 303 So. 2d 338 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 317 So. 2d 762 (Fla.1975). Second, the grounds relied on for the new trial order have no merit. The trial court properly admitted evidence concerning crimes having been committed in the immediate vicinity of the defendant’s business premises; Green Companies v.…

Authorities Cited

• Annabelle G. Belcher v. Belcher, 307 So. 2d 918 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)