VERNA M. LEHMANN ET AL., PETITIONERS,

v.

CLAUDE CLONIGER AND HIS WIFE, BLANCHE CLONIGER, RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• Alphonso Stuart v. State, 360 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 1978)
  …by order of the court, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191(d)(2), and will not be automatic or presumed from the circumstances, State v. Cannon, 332 So. 2d 127 (Fla.4th DCA 1976); Mullin v. State, 307 So. 2d 829 (Fla.3d DCA 1974), cert. denied 317 So. 2d 761 (Fla.1975); Pouncy v. State, 296 So. 2d 625 (Fla.3d DCA 1974); Esperti v. State, 276 So. 2d 58 (Fla.2d DCA), cert. denied 285 So. 2d 614 (Fla.1973), the question of whether the circumstances were such as would justify an extension of the rule time p…
• Tucker v. State, 357 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 1978)
  …d DCA 1977), and State v. Pearce, 336 So. 2d 1274 (Fla.1st DCA 1976), with Jenkins v. State, 349 So. 2d 1192 (Fla.4th DCA 1977), State v. Cannon, 332 So. 2d 127 (Fla.4th DCA 1976), and Mullin v. State, 307 So. 2d 829 (Fla.3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 317 So. 2d 761 (Fla.1975), the court below correctly determined that the automatic statutory stay would not be applicable to appeals of pre-trial orders other than those specified in Section 924.-071(1). 344 So. 2d at 286 n. 2. We have previously so held in Carrol…
• State v. Cannon, 332 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)
  …SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge. We agree with the trial judge and the Third District decision in Mullin v. State, 307 So. 2d 829 (Fla.App.3rd 1975), cert. den. 317 So. 2d 761 (Fla.1975), that an order under Rule 3.191(d) (2) (iv), F.R. Cr.P. is required to extend the speedy trial time during the pendency of an interlocutory appeal by' the state from an order suppressing evidence. Despite the state’s argument here, it is…

Authorities Cited

• Onoprienko v. Barton, 306 So. 2d 216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
• Mileva Konjevic and Mihajlo Konjevic v. State, 306 So. 2d 216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)