AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,

v.

SUPERIOR DAIRIES, INC., APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Smith v. State, 500 So. 2d 125 (Fla. 1986)
  …5 (Fla.1958) (vaguely worded charging document); Clair v. State, 406 So. 2d 109, 110 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981) (violation of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.220); Miller v. State, 373 So. 2d 377, 378 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979) (violation of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.220); Cannon v. State, 317 So. 2d 459, 460 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975) (violation of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j)); Broeck v. State, 317 So. 2d 100, 100 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975) (violation of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.170(j)); Vena v. State, 295 So. 2d 720, 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974) (violation of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.220),…
• Luckie Stradtman v. State, 334 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
  …record in this case, the trial court erred in allowing into evidence statements and testimony about the admissions made by him. See State v. Coney, Fla. 1973, 294 So. 2d 82; Adkins v. Smith, Fla. 1968, 205 So. 2d 530; Cannon v. State, Fla. App.1975, 317 So. 2d 459; Taylor v. State, Fla.App.1974, 292 So. 2d 375; and Rule 3.220 Rules of Criminal Procedure, 33 F.S.A. After a consideration of the record, all points in the briefs, and arguments of counsel in the light of the controlling principles of law, for the…
• Panno v. State, 517 So. 2d 129 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
  …rrect view. The controlling factor in plea withdrawal cases is showing of prejudice or manifest injustice. Florida cases in which failure to explore the factual basis for the guilty plea is charged provide this principle. See, e.g., Cannon v. State, 317 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); [Ten] Broeck v. State, 317 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). We hold the same principle must apply where the incorrect maximum sentence was stated to the defendant, and where the defendant is appealing the denial of his motion to…