KENNETH PETTIGREW, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
KENNETH PETTIGREW, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
316 So. 2d 69
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1975)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
[*70] PER CURIAM.
Entering without breaking with intent to commit a misdemeanor is not a lesser included offense to breaking and entering with the same intent. Skov v. State, Fla.App.2d, 1974, 292 So. 2d 64. See also O’Neal v. State, Fla.App.2d, 1975, 308 So. 2d 569. Therefore, appellant’s conviction of entering without breaking on an information charging breaking and entering must be reversed (Case No. 74-412). Appellant’s convictions in Case Nos. 74-and 74-413 are affirmed.
McNULTY, C. J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Roberts v. State, 320 So. 2d 832 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)…ering with the same intent. Beginning with Skov v. State, Fla.App.2d, 1974, 292 So. 2d 64, and followed in O’Neal v. State, Fla.App.2d, 1975, 308 So. 2d 569, we held that such a conviction cannot stand. See also Pettigrew v. State, Fla.App.2d, 1975, 316 So. 2d 69. We now find it necessary to revisit these decisions. The accusatory pleading in the case sub judice charged appellant with breaking [*833] and entering with intent to commit a misdemeanor, to wit: petit larceny. The jury returned a verdict of ente…
-
Hightower v. State, 324 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)…PER CURIAM. Appellant, charged with breaking and entering a building with intent to commit a misdemeanor, was convicted of entering without breaking a building with intent to commit a misdemeanor. Relying upon Pettigrew v. State, 316 So. 2d 69 (2nd DCA Fla.1975); O’Neal v. State, 308 So. 2d 569 (2nd DCA Fla.1975), and Skov v. State, 292 So. 2d 64 (2nd DCA Fla.1974), he contends that this is fundamental error. The cited cases have been expressly overruled. See Roberts v. State, 320 So. 2d…
-
Pettigrew v. State, 325 So. 2d 465 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976)…n if the Supreme Court relinquished jurisdiction to this court. The Supreme Court has now entered an order temporarily relinquishing jurisdiction to this court. In view of our holding in Roberts, our opinion in the instant case is. hereby withdrawn, 316 So. 2d 69, all three judgments entered below are affirmed, and the mandate in Case No. 74-412 shall be amended accordingly. McNULTY, C. J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- O'Neal v. State, 308 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)
- Skov v. State, 292 So. 2d 64 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974)