ROYAL CUSTOM BUILDERS, INC., AND CORPORATE GROUP SERVICE, INC., PETITIONERS,

v.

HOBSON GIBSON AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Hawthorne, 573 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 1991)
  …ave such familiarity with it as to know what it is worth); Vickers v. State, 303 So. 2d 700 (Fla. 1st DCA- 1974) (owner of stolen property is qualified to testify as to his opinion of the market value of his property at time of theft), cert. denied, 315 So. 2d 187 (Fla.1975).…
• Santana v. State, 795 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
  …114] 1st DCA 1999). The owner of property is generally considered to be qualified to testify as to the fair market value of that property at the time of theft. Id.; Fisher; see also Vickers v. State, 303 So. 2d 700 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), cert. denied, 315 So. 2d 187 (Fla.1975). Although defense counsel basically conceded at the restitution hearing that $6,000 was the fair market value, more problematic to our resolution of the issue before us is the failure of the State to submit evidence of the salvage value…
• K.F. and D.C. v. State, 746 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)
  …(Fla.1991). Moreover, an owner of property is considered to be qualified to testify as to the fair market value of that property at the time of theft. See id. at 333, n. 6. See also Vickers v. State, 303 So. 2d 700 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), cert. denied, 315 So. 2d 187 (Fla.1975). We reject appellants’ challenge to the restitution amount established by the trial court. We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s acceptance of the victim’s estimates of the value of his unrecov-ered property. Since there is…