THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
EDWIN L. MASON, DEFENDANT
THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
EDWIN L. MASON, DEFENDANT
315 So. 2d 179
Florida Supreme Court (1975)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
Petition denied.
OVERTON, Acting C. J., and DREW, J. (Retired), MILLS, District Court Judge, McCRARY and AGNER, Circuit Court Judges, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fort Lauderdale Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Fallaro, 616 So. 2d 594 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)…within a reasonable degree of certainty. See, e.g., Ed. L. Nezelek v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co., 383 So. 2d 979 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Ed Skoda Ford, Inc. v. P & P Paint & Body Shop, Inc., 302 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 315 So. 2d 179 (Fla.1975). Because appellant’s claim for lost profits was not speculative, appellant is entitled to recover its lost profits as a portion of its compensatory damages. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings. GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and LETTS an…
-
Plantation KEY Developers, Inc. v. Colonial Mortg. Co. OF Ind., Inc., 589 F.2d 164 (5th Cir. 1979)…profits which would have resulted from the performance of the contract and which may be ascertained with a reasonable degree of certainty.” Ed Skoda Ford, Inc. v. P&P Paint & Body Shop, Inc., 302 So. 2d 461, 461-62 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 315 So. 2d 179 (Fla.1975). Lost profits, however, is not the exclusive measure of damages for breach of contract. Indeed, the nonbreaching party has the choice of recovering either loss of profits or damages which will put him in the same position as he was prior…
-
Ad-Vantage Tel. Directory Consultants, Inc. v. GTE Directories Corp., 849 F.2d 1336 (11th Cir. 1987)…pts to justify its circumvention of this rule by arguing that it is inapplicable to a subchapter S corporation. It bases this argument on dicta found in Ed Skoda Ford, Inc. v. P & P Paint Body Shop, Inc., 277 So. 2d 818 (Fla.App.1973), cert. denied, 315 So. 2d 179 (Fla.1975). There, the court applied the above rule, and held that an estimate of lost profits that did not take account of officer’s salaries was inadequate as a matter of law. The court did state that Ed Skoda Ford, Inc. was not a subchapter S cor…