MAX A. MOGUL ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
AARON FODIMAN, AS TRUSTEE OF THE MICHAEL FAMILY TRUST, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 4th DCA | 1975-07-11
No. 75-181
OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.
315 So. 2d 108 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1975) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Savino v. Luciano, 92 So. 2d 817 (Fla.1957); Pattie Lea, Inc. v. District Court of the City and County of Denver, 161 Colo. 493, 423 P. 2d 27.

OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Gold Coast Raceway, Inc. v. Ehrenfeld, 392 So. 2d 1002 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
    …hielding from discovery matters within his own particular knowledge pertaining to a payment allegedly made to him for his client. As the court said in Silverman v. Turner, 188 So. 2d 354 (Fla.3d DCA 1966), followed by this Court in Mogul v. Fodiman, 315 So. 2d 108 (Fla.4th DCA 1975): [ W]here the attorney acts in any other capacity than as an attorney, such as a depository, or trustee, the attorney-client [*1003] relationship does not obtain, and that the subject matter must relate' to the subject matter of…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw