THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF HOMESTEAD ET AL., APPELLANTS,

v.

MONROE LOSNER, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 1976)
  …[*15] SUNDBERG, Justice. This is a petition for writ of certiorari to review a decision of the Third District Court of Appeal reported at 314 So. 2d 205, which is asserted to be in conflict with Westerman v. Shell’s City, Inc., 265 So. 2d 43 (Fla.1972), as well as similar cases which announce the proposition that an appellate court may not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court by re-ev…
• Monserrate B. McNAUGHTON v. McNAUGHTON, 332 So. 2d 673 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
  …nt of child support allowed. The wife’s point directed to the court’s failure to retain jurisdiction was well taken under the judgment for rehabilitative alimony. See Weinman v. Weinman, Fla.App.1975, 310 So. 2d 442; and Shaw v. Shaw, Fla.App.1975, 314 So. 2d 205. The court has properly retained jurisdiction for other purposes. In view of our determination that rehabilitative alimony is not proper in this case, we need not consider this point further. We hold that it was not error to require the wife to pay…
• Shaw v. Shaw, 336 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
  …PER CURIAM. WHEREAS, the judgment of this court was entered on June 10, 1975 (314 So. 2d 205) affirming with modifications the judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and. WHEREAS, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed May…

Authorities Cited

• Monroe Losner v. The First Nat'l Bank OF Homestead, 308 So. 2d 605 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)