THE BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF MANATEE COUNTY, FLORIDA,
v.
ALVAN B. ROWE

Fla. | 1943-04-27
BUFORD, C. J. TERRELL and CHAPMAN, JJ., concur.
152 Fla. 762 Florida Supreme Court (1943)
Also reported at: 13 So. 2d 151

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's judgment for the plaintiff, holding that the judgment was not excessive and was properly ordered to be paid from the general county school fund, not a special tax district fund.


Holding

The judgment was not excessive, and the trial court correctly ordered that it be paid from the general county school fund because the lawsuit was precipitated by the wrongful act of the County Board, which also authorized the fee.


Key Quotes

“On appeal from a judgment for plaintiff it is urged that the judgment is excessive and that the trial judge did not properly designate from what fund the judgment should be paid.”

This quote outlines the main points of contention raised by the appellant on appeal.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The case involves a prior judgment for the plaintiff, Alvan B. Rowe, against the Board of Public Instruction of Manatee County. On appeal, the Board a…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
ADAMS, J.:

ADAMS, J.:

The law of this case was settled on its former appearance in this Court. Board of Public Instruction of Manatee County v. Rowe, 151 Fla. 520, 10 So. (2nd) 311. On appeal from a *763judgment for plaintiff it is urged that the judgment is excessive and that the trial judge did not properly designate from what fund the judgment should be paid.

We find ample evidence to sustain the judgment which is $1400.00.

It is quite clear that the judgment is to be paid from the general county school fund and not from the special tax school district. It was the wrongful act of the County Board that precipitated the law suit and the fee sued for was authorized by the County Board. No obligation could have been incurred by the trustees of the district without the approval of the County Board. The action of the lower court in directing payment from the county general school fund was proper and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

BUFORD, C. J. TERRELL and CHAPMAN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw