JOSEPH ANDREWS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders V. California Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings, we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Foden v. Stambaugh, 405 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…court upon our holding that the record fails to support the trial court’s finding that petitioner authorized settlement. Travelers Insurance Co. v. Horton, 366 So. 2d 1204 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); 22nd Avenue Drugs, Inc. v. Maisonneuve Investments, Inc., 313 So. 2d 112 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. dismissed, 321 So. 2d 558 (Fla. 1975); State Department of Transportation v. Plunske, 267 So. 2d 337 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972). Remanded for further proceedings.…
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)