RAY SANDSTROM, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Hesston Corp. v. Roche, 599 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)
  …ss or the need for the particular position is eliminated. . Unless, of course, the parties expect that the promisee will be dead in less than a year. . Tanenbaum v. Biscayne Osteopathic Hospital, Inc., 190 So. 2d 777 (Fla.1966); Flowers v. Finley, 311 So. 2d 804 (Fla. 3d DCA1975); Ostman v. Lawn, 305 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 3d DCA1974). .Even an oral contract for employment for an indefinite period of time is within the statute of frauds. Johnson v. Edwards, 569 So. 2d 928 (Fla. 1st DCA1990).…
• Sandstrom v. State, 336 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 1976)
  …County, was affirmed by the Fourth District Court of Appeal in an opinion reported at 309 So. 2d 17. His later Dade County conviction was affirmed by the Third District Court of Appeal, on the authority of the earlier case, in a decision reported at 311 So. 2d 804. We tentatively granted certiorari to resolve an apparent conflict between these decisions and earlier Florida precedents.1 As will be developed more fully below, I believe that the conflict of decisions is direct, and that we have jurisdiction to r…
• Rice v. Cities Sewer Serv. OF Broward Cnty., Inc., 488 So. 2d 662 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
  …as a joint and indivisible undertaking of Cities Sewer and Pugh, and the employment and first refusal rights were indivisible from each other. Appellees cite authorities which they maintain support the latter contention. However, Flowers v. Finley, 311 So. 2d 804 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975) is distinguished by its facts, because it concerned an alleged promise of an interest in a joint venture as a part of an oral employment agreement for a multi-year term; and suit on the provision for an interest in the joint ventu…

Authorities Cited

• Sandstrom v. State, 309 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)