JOSEPH V. ROUNDTREE, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Walters v. McCALL, 450 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)
  …iation, Inc., 413 So. 2d 28 (Fla.1982), the right to enforce such restrictions pursuant to a general scheme must be reciprocal — the same restrictions must apply substantially to all lots of like character or similarly situated. See Mundy v. Carter, 311 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). Parcel A, as purchased by Coleman, was not subjected to any restrictions and only later did Coleman, of his own initiative, place residential use restrictions on his own property. Consequently, we conclude that appellants are no…
• Orange Gardens Civic Ass'n v. Harris, 382 So. 2d 1340 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
  …186 So. 2d 302 (Fla.2d DCA 1966); Barrett v. Leiher, 355 So. 2d 222 (Fla.2d DCA 1978); Heisler v. Marceau, 95 Fla. 135, 116 So. 447 (1928). Such restrictions are strictly construed in favor of the free and unrestricted use of land. Mundy v. Carter, 311 So. 2d 773 (Fla.lst DCA 1975); Voight v. Harbour Heights Improvement Assn., 218 So. 2d 803 (Fla.4th DCA 1969). Substantial ambiguity or doubt is resolved against the party claiming the right to enforce the restriction. Washington Apartment Hotel Co. v. Schneid…
• Killearn Lakes Homeowners Ass'n v. Sneller, 418 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
  …ded here on that theory. The order is reversed and the cause remanded for disposition consistent with this opinion. WIGGINTON, J., concurs. BOOTH, J., dissents with opinion. . Stephl v. Moore, 94 Fla. 313, 114 So. 455 (1927). . Mundy v. Carter, 311 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Wolff, 310 So. 2d 729 (Fla. 1975)