S. D. CREEL AND HIS WIFE, OVEIDO CREEL, APPELLANTS,
v.
R. S. ABERNETHY, APPELLEE
S. D. CREEL AND HIS WIFE, OVEIDO CREEL, APPELLANTS,
R. S. ABERNETHY, APPELLEE
102 Fla. 460
Florida Supreme Court (1931)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 136 So. 229
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
— The transcript of the reeord in this case has no index attached thereto, as is required by the Eules.
The assignments of error present only the question of the correctness of the findings and deeree of the chancellor based on question of fact.
There appears in the record substantial evidence to support the deeree appealed from and, therefore, such decree should be affirmed. It is so ordered.
Affirmed.
Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gardiner v. Goertner, 110 Fla. 377 (Fla. 1932)…. His finding should not be disturbed unless it is clearly erroneous or against the manifest weight of the evidence. Day v. Weadock, 101 Fla. 333, 134 So. 525; Fulton v. Clewiston Limited, 100 Fla. 257, 129 So. 773; Creel v. Abernathy, 102 Fla. 461, 136 So. 229; Jordon v. Jordan, 100 Fla. 1576, 132 So. 466; Farrington v. Harrison, 95 Fla. 769; 116 So. 497; Cramer v. Eichelberger, 96 Fla. 683, 118 So. 737; Shipley-Young Co. v. Young, 97 Fla. 46, 119 So. 522; Weaver-Loughridge Lbr. Co. v., Kirkland, 99 Fla.…
-
Bailey v. Mobile Home Park Realty, Inc., 579 So. 2d 198 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)…appeal. Second, while a motion in arrest of judgment will suspend the time for filing a notice of appeal, it has to be served after the verdict is received, but before the judgment is entered. Fla.R.App.P. 9.020; Harrington v. Bowman, 102 Fla. 339, 136 So. 229 (1931), modified, 106 Fla. 86, 143 So. 651 (1932) Here, the judgment was entered on December 8, 1989, thus making the motion three days late. Therefore, the motion for arrest of judgment was untime [*200] ly and did not suspend the time period for t…