NORMAN ROWE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1975-04-02
Nos. 74-41, 74-42
McNULTY, C. J., and GRIMES, J., and SIDWELL, BENJAMIN C., Associate Judge, concur.
310 So. 2d 40 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1975) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This case at first gave us pause contributed to in no small measure by the persuasive argument and articulate brief of counsel for appellant. However, upon a careful review of the record herein, we think reversible error has not been made clearly to appear. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from should be and it is hereby affirmed.

McNULTY, C. J., and GRIMES, J., and SIDWELL, BENJAMIN C., Associate Judge, concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Versluis v. Richard B. Wiggins: Ray Qualmann: Barnett Banks Tr. Co., 405 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
    …these conversations. We view the above-cited Supreme Court opinions as consistent with the trial court’s ruling which excluded only the evidence as to conversations between plaintiff and the decedent alone. Also see Rosenberg v. Boston Corporation, 310 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). The trial court correctly excluded the evidence in question and no other error has been made to appear. The final judgment below is thus affirmed. AFFIRM. MOORE and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.…
  • Boston Corp. v. Harry Rosenberg et ux., 324 So. 2d 633 (Fla. 1975)
    …Certiorari denied. 310 So. 2d 40. ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, OVERTON and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw