UNITED CAB COMPANY, INC., PETITIONER,
v.
YELLOW CAB COMPANY OF TAMPA, INC., RESPONDENT
UNITED CAB COMPANY, INC., PETITIONER,
YELLOW CAB COMPANY OF TAMPA, INC., RESPONDENT
310 So. 2d 32
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1975)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
In this petition for common law certiorari, United Cab Company seeks review of an order of the Circuit Court in and for Hillsborough County which in turn reversed an order of the Tampa Taxi Cab Commission.
It is now rudimentary, of course, that our gracious, discretionary writ of common law certiorari will issue only upon a clear showing that the court below departed from the essential requirements of law resulting in the petitioner’s irreparable injury. The petition and the record herein fail to meet this test in either respect.
Accordingly, the petition for a common law writ of certiorari should be, and the same is hereby, denied.
McNULTY, C. J., and HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
R.W. Roberts Constr. Co., Inc. v. ST. Johns River Water Mgmt. Dist. for the Use & Benefit of McDonald Elec. & Repair Serv., Inc., 423 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)…A 1980). A writ of common law certiorari should issue only upon a clear showing that the court below departed from the essential requirements of law resulting in petitioner’s irreparable injury. United Cab Co., Inc. v. Yellow Cab Co. of Tampa, Inc., 310 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). McDonald contends that the trial court properly found that the arbitration clause in the instant case was invalid. This argument is based on the fact that the arbitration clause only requires arbitration of claims by the sub-con…