REUBEN LEE TOBLER, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1974-11-19
No. 73-1196
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, TJ.
303 So. 2d 371 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1974) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an order denying appellant’s motion pursuant to rule 3.8S0, CrPR, to vacate judgment and sentence. The judgment was entered upon a plea of guilty. Appellant alleges in his motion that the plea was entered upon a promise that he would receive an examination by a psychiatrist and a further examination to determine whether he was suffering from brain damage. The purpose of the examination was to determine appellant’s mental capacity at the' time of the criminal acts as well as at the time of the trial.

The State confesses that the examinations were never ordered or performed. The record supports this confession of error. The cause is remanded with directions to' grant appellant’s motion and to set aside the guilty plea and for such further proceedings as may be proper under law. See Pope v. State, 56 Fla. 81, 47 So. 487 (1908) and Hill v. State, Fla.App. 1959, 110 So. 2d 464.

Reversed and remanded.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Meyers v. State, 315 So. 2d 184 (Fla. 1975)
    …Certiorari denied. 303 So. 2d 371. ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, OVERTON, and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.…
  • A.P. v. State, 652 So. 2d 1285 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Simmons v. State, 305 So. 2d 178 (Fla.1974); Johnson v. State, 574 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); J.Y. v. State, 332 So. 2d 643 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); O’Sullivan v. State, 335 So. 2d 869 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Meyers v. State, 303 So. 2d 371 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); cert. denied, 315 So. 2d 184 (Fla.1975).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw