OTIS DAVID JACKSON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders V. California Procedure cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Porter v. State, 308 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)…y as to the voluntariness of the plea or make a determination that the circumstances surrounding the pleas reflected a full understanding of the significance of the pleas as required by Rule 3.170(j) [*581] RCrP. See Wooff v. State, Fla.App.2d 1974, 303 So. 2d 49, and cases cited therein. The order denying the motion to vacate is reversed and the cause is remanded to the lower court with directions to vacate the judgments and sentences, set aside the pleas, and permit appellant to plead anew. Reversed and…
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)