SONDRA M. DESHLER, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co. v. Hickman, 445 So. 2d 1023 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
  …how that the newly discovered evidence would alter the course of the trial. However, such a motion is directed to the sound discretion of the trial judge. Alston v. Shiver; Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Pickard, 289 So. 2d 781 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1974), cert. den. 300 So. 2d 897 (Fla.1974). In the instant case, while Mrs. Hickman’s false testimony was material with regard to her derivative claim, her testimony with regard to Mr. Hickman’s injuries was merely cumulative. Accordingly, on this record, we cannot say that the tr…
• Rogowski v. State, 643 So. 2d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)
  …e jury that the state had the burden of proof in the case and that the defendant “need not prove anything.” The defendant was not deprived of a fair trial by this comment. See Deshler v. State, 298 So. 2d 428, 429-30 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert. dismissed, 300 So. 2d 897 (Fla.1974). Finally, there is no merit to the remaining claim that the state attorney made other improper comments. Moreover, none of the eomplained-of comments discussed above, either individually or collectively, deprived the defendant of a fair…

Authorities Cited

• Sondra M. Deshler v. State, 298 So. 2d 428 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)