VICTOR MIRANDA, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Howell v. State, 337 So. 2d 823 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)
  …he alleged omission must be timely raised. To hold otherwise would be contrary to the obvious intent of the rest of Rule 3.6 l. which provides for the method of correcting such an omission. (See Largo v. Imperial Homes Corporation, Fla.App. 2d 1974, 300 So. 2d 311) We have not overlooked our holdings in Merritt v. Williams, Fla.App. 1st 1974, 295 So. 2d 310 and White v. White, Fla.App. 1st 1975, 306 So. 2d 608, wherein we held that an appellate court may not consider a case unless the record reveals all evid…
• Miranda v. State, 309 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 1975)
  …Certiorari denied. 300 So. 2d 311. ROBERTS, DEICLE, OVERTON and ENGLAND, JJ., concur. ADKINS, C. J., and McCAIN, J., and ERVIN, Ret. J., dissent.…
• Brake v. Eve E. Murphy and Richard Murphy, 773 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
  …d, are only required to include those materials relevant to the issues before the appellate court. See Morgan v. Poke, 611 So. 2d 1315 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Conner v. Coggins, 349 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Town of Largo v. Imperial Homes Corp., 300 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974) (analyzing record under Rule 3.6, the predecessor to Rule 9.200); Morceau v. Meader, 179 So. 2d 242 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965) (same); Wilder v. Altman, 179 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965) (same). Common sense, therefore, dictates that app…

Authorities Cited

• Bloneva Clark v. State, 293 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)