BELCHER OIL COMPANY INC.,
v.
OVID FEASTER
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a judgment for damages in a car accident case, finding sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict and no reversible error.
The court held that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's verdict and that no reversible error occurred.
“From an examination we cannot say that the evidence was insufficient.”
Establishes the court's finding regarding the sufficiency of evidence.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe case involved a collision between a light automobile truck and a truck operated by the defendant, which was stopped across the highway for repair …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Appeal brings for review a judgment in favor of plaintiff for damages suffered by reason of a collision between a light automobile truck and a truck then under the control of the defendant and being used in repair work on the highway and which, at the time of the collision, had just been brought to a stop in position across the highway.
The appellant presents two questions which challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and judgment.
From an examination we cannot say that the evidence was insufficient.
Under clear and sufficient pleading the issues were, under proper instructions by the court, submitted to the jury resulting in the verdict for plaintiff.
The trial court, in overruling motion for new trial', placed its stamp of approval on the verdict.
On consideration of the entire record, it is not made clearly to appear that any reversible error has occurred and so the judgment should be, and is, affirmed.
So ordered.
Affirmed.
BROWN, C. J„ WHITFIELD, BUFORD, and ADAMS, JJ., concur.