HUBER DISTRIBUTING CO., INC., ETC., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
NATIONAL DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC., ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES; HUBER DISTRIBUTING CO., INC., ETC., ET AL., PETITIONERS, V. NATIONAL DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC., ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS
HUBER DISTRIBUTING CO., INC., ETC., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
NATIONAL DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC., ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES; HUBER DISTRIBUTING CO., INC., ETC., ET AL., PETITIONERS, V. NATIONAL DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC., ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS
293 So. 2d 717
Florida Supreme Court (1974)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
Certiorari dismissed. 283 So. 2d 122.
ADKINS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur. McCAIN, J., dissents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dade Cnty. v. Nat'l Bulk Carriers, Inc., 450 So. 2d 213 (Fla. 1984)…is case conflicts with City of Miami Beach v. Lachman, 71 So. 2d 148 (Fla.1953), appeal dismissed, 348 U.S. 906, 75 S.Ct. 292, 99 L.Ed. 711 (1955), and Mailman Development Corp. v. City of Hollywood, 286 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973), cert. denied, 293 So. 2d 717 (Fla.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 844, 95 S.Ct. 77, 42 L.Ed.2d 72 (1974). Respondent, National Bulk Carriers, is the owner of 1,850 acres of property located in Dade County, Florida. The land was previously owned by Seadade Realty, Inc. In 1962, Sead…1 / 2
-
Rainbow Lighting, Inc. v. Lawton Chiles, 707 So. 2d 939 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)….J.T., Inc., 437 So. 2d 200 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Hardage v. City of Jacksonville Beach, 399 So. 2d 1077 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 411 So. 2d 382 (Fla.1981); Mailman Dev. Corp. v. City of Hollywood, 286 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973), cert. denied, 293 So. 2d 717 (Fla.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 844, 95 S.Ct. 77, 42 L.Ed.2d 72 (1974). Accordingly, the dismissal of the amended complaint is affirmed. GERSTEN, J., concurs.…
-
Hahn v. First Nat'l Bank OF Delray Beach, 345 So. 2d 345 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977)…n., 222 So. 2d 748 (Fla.1969); Shalabey v. Memorial Hosp. of South Broward Hosp. Dist., 253 So. 2d 712, 714-15 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971), cert. den., 257 So. 2d 562 (Fla.1972); Nicholson v. Eli Lilly and Co., 285 So. 2d 648 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973), cert. den., 293 So. 2d 717 (Fla.1974). It has also been held that the trial court is empowered, in the exercise of sound discretion, to dismiss a cause or deny relief for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute in response to a direct order. See State ex rel. Croker v. Chillingwort…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Heard v. State, 283 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973)