JOSEPH SAWYER, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1974-03-26
No. 73-194
Before CARROLL, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
292 So. 2d 623 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1974)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A defendant who voluntarily pleads guilty cannot later claim coercion based on alleged perjured grand jury testimony known to the defendant at the time of the plea.


Facts & Procedural History

Defendant was indicted for first-degree murder, pled guilty to manslaughter, and was sentenced. He later moved to vacate the sentence, alleging the pl…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-appellant was indicted for first degree murder and pled not guilty thereto. Subsequently, he withdrew the plea and pled guilty to the crime of manslaughter. He was sentenced to ten years in the state penitentiary.

Thereafter, appellant filed a motion to vacate and set aside judgment and sentence in which he alleged that based upon the grand jury testimony of two witnesses, he pled guilty to the lesser offense of manslaughter and subsequent thereto, he learned that this testimony was perjured and therefore he was coerced into pleading guilty to manslaughter. The trial judge denied this motion and appellant appeals therefrom.

Simply, we find the defendant’s position illogical as defendant had knowledge of his own guilt or innocence and therefore knew whether the subject grand jury testimony was true or false. The appellant in the case sub judice, having pled guilty voluntarily to the lesser offense and thereby having chosen not to chance trial and a resulting verdict of guilty and possible death sentence, is now precluded from complaining of the course of action which he elected to pursue. Accordingly, the order deny ing appellant’s motion is affirmed. Cf. Desort v. State, Fla.App.1974, 287 So. 2d 719.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw