SAM N. SPODOFORA AND JEROLD R. SMITH, APPELLANTS,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1973-12-13
Nos. R-354, R-355
SPECTOR, Acting C. J., JOHNSON and BOYER, JJ., concur.
292 So. 2d 371 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1973) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The record on appeal and the briefs submitted by the parties herein having been fully considered and it appearing therefrom that appellants have failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgments appealed are therefore Affirmed.

SPECTOR, Acting C. J., JOHNSON and BOYER, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Roberts v. State, 521 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
    …So. 2d 219 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973). He filed a second Rule 3.850 motion, raising the issues of illegal consecutive sentences and ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court denied that motion, and this court per curiam affirmed. Roberts v. State, 292 So. 2d 371 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974). Appellant filed a third Rule 3.850 motion, raising a double jeopardy issue. The trial court denied the motion. Appellant filed a fourth Rule 3.850 motion, raising again the issue of illegal consecutive sentences and error in the…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw