STATE OF FLORIDA
v.
CITY OF DELRAY BEACH, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's validation of refunding bonds for the City of Delray Beach. The court found the legal questions and factual conditions to be materially the same as in a prior case involving the same city, thus relying on its previous ruling.
No, the factual conditions and legal questions are not materially different from those in the prior case.
“There is no material difference between the factual conditions and the legal questions presented in this case and those which existed and were presented in the case of State v. City of Delray Beach, 140 Fla. 132, 191 Sou. 188.”
Establishes the basis for applying prior precedent.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe City of Delray Beach sought to validate Series B refunding bonds under Resolution No. 389, totaling $352,350.00. The circuit court validated and c…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
On final hearing in a suit to validate Series B refunding bonds contemplated under Resolution No. 389 under date of February 17, 1941, of the City Council of the City of Delray Beach, Florida, a municipal corporation, in the sum of $352,350.00, the issuance of such bonds was by final decree of the cir*742cuit court having jurisdiction thereof validated and confirmed.
There is no material difference between the factual conditions and the legal questions presented in this case and those which existed and were presented in the case of State v. City of Delray Beach, 140 Fla. 132, 191 Sou. 188. Therefore, the disposition of this case is ruled by our opinion and judgment in that case.
No reversible error being made to appear, the decree of validation is affirmed.
So ordered.
Affirmed.
Brown, C. J., Whitfield and Adams, J. J., concur.