DONALD S. BRYANT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 1974-04-02
No. T-163
SPECTOR, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, B. K., and CHRISTIE, IRWIN G., Associate Judges, concur.
292 So. 2d 36 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1974)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The appellate court affirmed the trial court's dismissal of the writ of mandamus, finding the appellant's resort to mandamus was premature.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant sought a writ of mandamus to reverse an order dismissing it. The trial court believed the matter should first be determined by the State Boa…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

By this appeal, appellant seeks to reverse an order dismissing and quashing a writ of mandamus, which said order of dismissal was entered in the trial court. In its order of dismissal, the trial court stated its view that this matter should be determined initially by the State Board of Medical Examiners with the right to review thereafter by petition for writ of certiorari.

Our review of the record, briefs and arguments herein convinces us that the Order reviewed herein should be affirmed. Section 458.1201(4), Florida Statutes, F.S. A., empowers the Board with discretion in appropriate cases to restore and reissue licenses which have heretofore been revoked or suspended. It seems to us that appellant’s resort to mandamus in the lower court was premature. His quest for reinstatement should commence with a petition for restoration or reissuance filed with the appellee pursuant to the cited statute.

Accordingly, the final order reviewed herein is affirmed without prejudice, of course, to appellant’s right to petition the appellee Board in accordance with the foregoing.

SPECTOR, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, B. K., and CHRISTIE, IRWIN G., Associate Judges, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw