BERNARD WILBERT HENSLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
BERNARD WILBERT HENSLEY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
291 So. 2d 71
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1974)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and no reversible error having been demonstrated, the final judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed.
RAWLS, C. J., and BOYER and Mc-CORD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Goodman v. Olsen, 365 So. 2d 393 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)…ble New York law, and therefore the agreement was unenforceable.2 After a trial, the jury rendered a verdict in favor of Olsen and a judgment thereon was executed. The verdict and judgment were subsequently affirmed by this court. Goodman v. Olsen, 291 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). However, this court’s decision was quashed by the Supreme Court of Florida, and the cause was remanded for a new trial. Goodman v. Olsen, 305 So. 2d 753 (Fla.1974). The court, through Justice McCain, held that it was error to all…1 / 2
-
Goodman v. Olsen, 307 So. 2d 842 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)…PER CURIAM. Whereas the judgment of this court was entered on March 12, 1974 (291 So. 2d 71) affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and Whereas on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed November 7, 1974 (305 So…