HUSSEY MANUFACTURING CO. AND MERCO OF FLORIDA CORP., APPELLANTS,

v.

CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Tsavaris, 382 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)
  …hat the self-incrimination clauses of the federal and Florida constitutions were violated when books and records belonging to the defendants in a criminal case were obtained by the state through the execution of a search warrant. In State v. Dawson, 290 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), subpoenas duces tecum were served on office employees of a defendant requiring them to appear before the grand jury and bring with them certain of the defendant’s records. The First District Court of Appeal held that the defenda…
• In re Est. of Beatrice S. Rasmussen v. Honorable Edwin Duff, II, 335 So. 2d 634 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)
  …on is a personal one. The individual and his records are both constitutionally protected. However, this immunity is designed to protect personal documents or papers, or at least those in his possession in a purely personal capacity. State v. Dawson, 290 So. 2d 79 (Fla.App. 1st, 1974). The documents sought in the case before us were not personal to Mattingly; they were documents which he was required to prepare or keep in carrying out his fiduciary duties as executor of the estate. We agree with the probate c…
• Cowan v. People of the State of Fla., 463 So. 2d 285 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
  …angement and other compensation agreements. FDA contends that because the request to produce is directed only at the P.A., the fifth amendment does not apply because of the corporation exception. Cowan and Rosa reply by pointing to State v. Dawson, 290 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), which held that the rule that self-incrimination does not apply to corporations is inapplicable to professional service corporations. Dawson’s holding was largely grounded upon Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 6 S.Ct. 624, 2…

Authorities Cited

• Fla. Power & Light Co. v. Gen. Safety Equip. Co., 213 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)