FRANCISCO CHURRUCA ET AL., PETITIONERS,
v.
MIAMI JAI-ALAI, INC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Fla. | 1974-01-23
No. 44009
CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur., ERVIN and DEKLE, JJ., dissent.
289 So. 2d 395 Florida Supreme Court (1974) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the Writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the Writ must be and is hereby discharged and the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is dismissed, without prejudice to whatever rights, if any, petitioners may have for tortious conspiracy, if any, occurring subsequent to the 1968-69 Jai-Alai season.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur. ERVIN and DEKLE, JJ., dissent.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Churruca v. Miami Jai-Alai, Inc., 353 So. 2d 547 (Fla. 1977)
    …nd this Court discharged a petition for writ of certiorari “without prejudice to whatever rights, if any, petitioners may have for tortious conspiracy occurring subsequent to the 1968-1969 jai-alai season.” Churruca et al. v. Miami Jai-Alai, et al., 289 So. 2d 395 (Fla.1974). Petitioners then filed the present action against respondents alleging that respondents were engaging in a conspiracy not to employ them. Essentially, plaintiffs alleged that defendants agreed collectively to refuse them employment in re…
  • Churruca v. Miami Jai-Alai, Inc., 338 So. 2d 228 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
    …Florida Supreme Court was discharged “without prejudice to whatever rights, if any, petitioners may have for tor-tious conspiracy, if any, occurring subsequent to the 1968-69 jai-alai season.” See Churruca et al. v. Miami Jai-Alai et al., Fla.1974, 289 So. 2d 395. Thereafter plaintiffs filed this action against the defendant frontons and Department of Business Regulation alleging a conspiracy on the part of all defendants in that they conspired not to employ plaintiffs. Their original and amended complaints…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw