GERAINT PARRY, PETITIONER,

v.

HAVERTY FURNITURE COMPANY ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• Andrews v. TEW, 512 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)
  …t, courts have commonly utilized skid mark testimony to assist the trier of fact. See Kerr v. Caraway, 78 So. 2d 571 (Fla.1955); Quinn v. Millard, 358 So. 2d 1378 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Taylor v. Posey, 283 So. 2d 118 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973), cert. denied, 289 So. 2d 9 (Fla.1974). In Taylor, on similar facts, an expert was called to testify as to the speed of the car at the time it laid down the skid marks. The court held that there was a proper predicate for the expert opinion and ruled that any questions regardi…
• Johnson v. State, 427 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
  …o provide “the names and addresses of all persons known to the prosecutor to have information which may be relevant to the offense charged, and to any defense with respect thereto.” In State v. Johnson, 285 So. 2d 53 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1973), cert. dism. 289 So. 2d 9 (1974), the court interpreted this rule as requiring revelation only of those having knowledge as to substantial matters involved in the case. There the court determined that the State properly refused disclosure of a confidential informant who was…
• State v. Natson, 661 So. 2d 926 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
  …mant”). There is no indication that the use of the term “confidential informant” in the rule was intended to have the restricted meaning which the trial court has suggested. In State v. Johnson, 285 So. 2d 53, 55 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973), cert, dismissed, 289 So. 2d 9 (Fla.1974), the second district commented that despite “the commonly-thought-of definition of a confidential informant who, in exchange for ren-umeration, tips off a law enforcement agency that a suspect has committed or is likely to commit a crime,…