THE CENTRAL NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF OMAHA, APPELLANT,
v.
WILLIAM ALFRED LAMOS ET AL., APPELLEES
THE CENTRAL NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF OMAHA, APPELLANT,
WILLIAM ALFRED LAMOS ET AL., APPELLEES
287 So. 2d 349
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1973)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This is a consolidated appeal from a summary final judgment involving the is sue of whether coverage was provided by an automobile liability insurance policy. The trial court found that coverage existed under the rule set forth in Makris v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Fla.App.1972, 267 So. 2d 105. Our review of the record convinces us that error has not been shown. We have considered appellant’s further contention that coverage was erroneously found to exist because of the failure of its policyholder to promptly inform it of the claim. We find this contention insufficient to present error on the basis of the record. See Tiedtke v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, Fla.1969, 222 So. 2d 206.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The Cent. Nat'l Ins. Co. OF Omaha v. Lamos, 297 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 1974)…Certiorari denied. 287 So. 2d 349. ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur. DEKLE, J., dissents.…
Authorities Cited
- Tiedtke v. Fid. & Cas. Co. OF NEW York, 222 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 1969)
- Koreck v. Barry Coll., 267 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
- Aris Emanoli Makris v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 267 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)