ALEXANDER ORR, JR., INTERVENOR-APPELLANT,
v.
R. C. GARDNER, AND MIAMI WATER COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION; CITY OF MIAMI, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA; A. E. FULLER, AS DIRECTOR OF FINANCE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI; L. L. LEE, CITY MANAGER, OF THE CITY OF MIAMI; HERBERT S. SAWYER; FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court found nothing in the appeal affecting the validity of the bond contract.
Appellees moved to advance an appeal for early disposition, concerned about its effect on an $8,000,000 bond validation and a contract for asset purch…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Order
This cause comes on to be heard on the motion of Appellees to advance for early disposition, on the merits or to consider the merits and determine whether or not any question or matter raised on the appeal will or could affect the validity of or prevent the delivery of the $8,000,000 City of Miami Water Revenue Bonds heretofore validated by this Court in State, et al., v. City of Miami, 200 So. 535, and the consummation of the contract for the purchase of the assets of the Miami Water Company set for April 4, 1941, in New York City.
The record on appeal has been examined and we find nothing that in any way affects the validity of or that prevents the consummation of the bond contract as heretofore referred to. The appeal-is similar in all material respects to Harry J. Tryon v. City of Miami, et al., considered this date on application for constitutional writ. For the reasons stated in the order so made, this case in no way affects the validity of the bonds or the bond contract set for consummation April 4, 1941. Other questions presented will be determined in due course.
It is so ordered.
. Brown, C. J., Whitfield, Terrell, Buford, Chapman, Thomas and Adams, J. J., concur.