EDSEL GRIFFIN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Separate And Distinct Offenses cases and more on FLexlaw
OWEN, Chief Judge.
Appellant-Griffin held one Hendricks and another at gunpoint, caused an accomplice to bind the victims’ hands with tape, and then removed the contents of the victims’ pockets. Before departing the scene, appellant put the pistol to Hendricks’ head and threatened to blow his brains out.
Appellant, convicted of both robbery and aggravated assault, contends upon the authority of Morrison v. State, Fla.App. 1972, 259 So. 2d 502, that he should not have been convicted and sentenced on the latter charge as it was a lesser included offense of the former. The evidence sustains the conviction and separate sentence on both the robbery and aggravated assault charges because of the aggravated assault occurring separate and apart from, and after completion of, the robbery. Wade v. Wainwright, Fla.App. 1972, 266 So. 2d 378.
Affirmed.
CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
DiCAPRIO v. Polk, 335 So. 2d 857 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)…ate specified in such rule, it is the opinion of the court that defendant shall be forthwith released from incarceration in Seminole County and shall remain at liberty unless and until compliance with section 949.11, Florida Statute. Grose v. Stack, 286 So. 2d 220 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973). Petition for habeas corpus GRANTED. MAGER, C. J., and DOWNEY and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur. . “949.11 Hearing. — Any person whose parole or probation agreement is revoked pursuant to § 949.10 shall be given a hearing pursuant to…
-
Morris v. State, 396 So. 2d 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…y himself. See, Crosby v. State, 97 So. 2d 181 (Fla.1957). 4. The state’s alleged failure to comply with the provisions of Section 949.11, Fla. Stat. (1979) is totally immaterial to the validity of the convictions under review. See, Grose v. Stack, 286 So. 2d 220 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).1 Affirmed. . The contentions initially raised in the reply brief are both untimely and without merit. See, Williamson v. State, 388 So. 2d 1345 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).…
Authorities Cited
- Wade v. Louie L. Wainwright, 266 So. 2d 378 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972)
- Morrison v. State, 259 So. 2d 502 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)