KERMIT C. BROWN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1973-11-13
No. 73-373
Before BARKDULL, C. J. and PEARSON and CARROLL, JJ.
285 So. 2d 425 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1973) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was tried before the court, having waived trial by jury, and upon a charge of second degree murder was found guilty of manslaughter. On this appeal, it is urged that the evidence was insufficient-because it was circumstantial and subject to a reasonable hypothesis of innocence. See Stewart v. State, 158 Fla. 753, 30 So. 2d 489 (1947). Such a holding is not applicable in this case because the appellant admitted to the killing, gave inconsistent versions of the events, and upon the witness stand testified to facts completely at variance with the hypothesis now suggested as a reasonable hypothesis of innocence. Since no error appears, the judgment and sentence are affirmed. See Groneau v. State, Fla.App.1967, 201 So. 2d 599. See also the rule stated in Bryan v. State, 141 Fla. 676, 194 So. 385 (1940).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Almerini v. State, 315 So. 2d 207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)
    …a.App.1969, 220 So. 2d 399; Reynolds v. State, Fla.App.1969, 222 So. 2d 246; Coppolino v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 223 So. 2d 68; Costantino v. State, Fla.App.1969, 224 So. 2d 341; State v. Craig, Fla.1970, 237 So. 2d 737; Brown v. State, Fla.App.1973, 285 So. 2d 425; Demattia v. State, Fla.App. 1974, 292 So. 2d 390; Edwards v. State, Fla.App.1974, 302 So. 2d 479; Melero v. State, Fla.App. 1975, 306 So. 2d 603.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw