MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY OF BALTIMORE, MARYLAND, APPELLANT,
v.
Q. D. SAULS, ET UX., APPELLEES
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY OF BALTIMORE, MARYLAND, APPELLANT,
Q. D. SAULS, ET UX., APPELLEES
146 Fla. 166
Florida Supreme Court (1941)
Also reported at: 200 So. 366
Opinion of the Court
The decree of the court below is affirmed upon the authority of Burton v. McMillan, 52 Fla. 469, 42 So. 849, 8 L. R. A. (N. S.) 991, 120 A. S. R. 220, 11 Ann. Cas. 380, and Sheldon v. Wilfore, 136 Fla. 312, 186 So. 508. See also 17 Am. Juris. 888-889. There was ample evidence before the chancellor to sustain his decree under the authority of the above cited cases. No reversible error appearing in the record, the decree appealed from is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
Brown, C. J., Terrell, Buford, Chapman and Adams, J. J., concur.
Thomas, J., dissents.
Whitfield, J., not participating.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Burton v. McMillan, 52 Fla. 469 (Fla. 1906)
- E. R. Sheldon for Morris Plan Co. of St. Petersburg v. Wilfore, 136 Fla. 312 (Fla. 1939)