JAMES L. PAXSON, JR., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
DADE COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1973-07-10
Nos. 72-1089, 72-1100
Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, J J.
284 So. 2d 14 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1973) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

These appeals arose out of a proceeding in eminent domain by Dade County, lor acquisition of certain lands for park purposes. The propriety of the taking was established on an earlier appeal, Dade County v. Paxson et al., Fla.App.1972, 270 So. 2d 455. Later a jury trial was had on issues relating to valuation of the property taken. Verdict was rendered and judgment entered thereon. Dissatisfied with the amounts awarded them by the verdict and judgment, the defendants James L. Paxson, Jr., and Jean Paxson, his wife, Donald Farquahar and Amelia B. Farquahar, his wife (by No. 72-1100), and Charles F. Harvey and Juanita Harvey, his wife, Helen A. Arnold, Arthur L. Hiestand and Elaine D. Hiestand, his wife, Martin Fine and Helen Margaret Fine, his wife, Maxwell Coleman and Ann Coleman, his wife (by No. 72-1089), appealed from the judgment. The appeals were consolidated here. Briefs were filed on behalf of appellants Paxsons and Harveys. Upon consideration of the contentions presented on behalf of appellants, in the light of the record, briefs and argument, we hold no reversible error has been demonstrated.

The judgment is affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Paxson v. Dade Cnty., 300 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 1974)
    …Certiorari denied. 284 So. 2d 14. ADKINS, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN and OVERTON, JJ., concur. McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., dissent.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw