WILMA BELL POUNCEY, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Dickey v. Cir. Court, 200 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 1967)
  …362 P. 2d 763. Moreover, it operates with equal efficacy to make a state prisoner available for federal trial, United States v. Clinton, supra, and United States v. Kipp, supra, or for trial in another state. Pellegrini v. Wolfe, 1955, 225 Ark. 459, 283 So. 2d 162. Indeed, on at least one occasion officials of the State of Florida honored such a request and produced a state prisoner for trial on a federal indictment. Harrell v. Shuttleworth, U.S.D.C.N.D.Florida 1951, 101 F.Supp. 408. The second question — wh…
• Davis v. State, 306 So. 2d 166 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)
  …PER CURIAM. There were two substantive points raised in appellant’s motion to vacate under Rule 3.850, CrPR. The one which related to the execution of the search warrant was foreclosed in appellant’s direct appeal. Davis v. State, Fla.App.2d, 1973, 283 So. 2d 162. In his second point, appellant asserted the existence of recent circumstances allegedly showing that some of the facts set forth in the affidavit for the search warrant were untrue. Assuming, without deciding, that this would be a proper basis upo…
• Pouncey v. State, 289 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 1974)
  …Certiorari denied. 283 So. 2d 162. CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.…