MELTON DADJAD BLACKMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MELTON DADJAD BLACKMAN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
282 So. 2d 34
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1973)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
We feel that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is, therefore, dispensed with pursuant to Rule 3.10(e), F. A.R., 32 F.S.A.
Affirmed.
MANN, C. J., and HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cruz v. State, 312 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)…PER CURrAM. Affirmed. See Ashford v. State, Fla. 1973, 274 So. 2d 517; Terrell v. State, Fla. App.1973, 282 So. 2d 34.…
-
Rolle v. State, 323 So. 2d 284 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377, 88 S.Ct. 967, 19 L. Ed.2d 1247; and Terrell v. State, Fla.App. 1973, 282 So. 2d 34.…