STATE EX REL. EDWARD J. MCGRATH, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
D. C. COLEMAN, SHERIFF OF DADE COUNTY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
McGrath sought habeas corpus relief challenging his confinement in Dade County jail under a Monroe County murder indictment, arguing the proof was not evident nor the presumption great. The Florida Supreme Court reversed the lower court's denial of bail, finding insufficient evidence to support the presumption of guilt required for pretrial detention without bail.
The Florida Supreme Court held that the proof was not evident nor the presumption great that McGrath committed the charged crime, and therefore reversed the circuit court's order denying bail. The Court directed the Monroe County circuit judge to set appropriate bail conditions for McGrath's release.
“the proof that the petitioner committed the crime charged in the indictment was not evident nor the presumption great”
States McGrath's constitutional challenge to pretrial detention under Florida's proof-evident or presumption-great standard
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceEdward J. McGrath was confined in the Dade County jail pursuant to a first-degree murder indictment issued by a Monroe County grand jury. McGrath peti…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Right To Bail cases and more on FLexlaw
On petition for writ of habeas corpus filed in the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, it was made to appear that Edward J. McGrath was being confined to the county jail of Dade County, Florida, under an indictment returned by a grand jury of Monroe County, Florida, charging him with the crime of murder in the first degree. The petitioner contended that his confinement in the Dade County jail under the aforesaid indictment was unlawful and contrary to the constitutional rights of the said Edward J. McGrath in that the proof that the petitioner committed the crime charged in the indictment was not evident nor the presumption great.
A writ issued on the petition and testimony in support of the tendered issues taken before the lower court, and, after hearing all the testimony, the lower court made and entered an order remanding the petitioner to the custody of the Sheriff of Dade County, Florida, but allowed a writ of error therefrom to this Court. The appeal was perfected and the case has been orally argued by counsel and on briefs. We have read the testimony appearing in the record and the several cases cited in the briefs. AVe conclude, from a careful consideration of all the testimony, that the proof is not evident nor the presumption great that Edward J. Mc-Grath committed the crime charged in the indictment presented by a Monroe County grand jury against the petitioner. We are not advised of testimony except that certified to us by the circuit judge and base our conclusion on the *448.transcript of the record certified to this Court. See Deeb v. Gandy, 110 Fla. 283, 148 So. 540.
The judgment of the'lower court denying bail and remanding the petitioner to the custody of the Sheriff of Dade County, Florida, to be held without bail under the indictment presented by the Monroe County grand jury is hereby reversed with directions that the Judge of the Circuit Court of Monroe County, by appropriate order, fix the amount and conditions of bail to be furnished by the petitioner Edward J. McGrath. See Ex parte: Emory Williams, et al., 135 Fla. 283, 184 So. 851.
It is so ordered.
Whitfield, Brown and Thomas, J. J., concur.
Chief Justice Terrell and Justices Buford and Adams not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Deeb v. Gandy, 110 Fla. 283 (Fla. 1933)
- Town of Bradley v. Kirkland, 110 Fla. 239 (Fla. 1933)
- Harris v. State, 135 Fla. 251 (Fla. 1938)
- Ex Parte: Emory Williams & John Williams, 135 Fla. 283 (Fla. 1938)