GERSHON S. MILLER, PETITIONER,

v.

DAVID GOLDMAN, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• State of Fla. ex rel. Charles Patrick Norman v. The Honorable Arden Mays Merckle & the Honorable J. Rogers Padgett, 369 So. 2d 964 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)
  …ven in this case under (d)(2) limits the continuance and setting the case within a reasonable time thereafter pursuant to (f). We find the facts of this case strikingly similar to those in King v. State, 303 So. 2d 389 (Fla.3d DCA 1974), cert. den. 314 So. 2d 775 (Fla.1975). In King, defendant was arrested on April 4, 1973 and trial was set for October 17, 1973. The state moved for a continuance because of the unavailability of a witness. The trial court granted a 30 day extension of the speedy trial rule bu…
• McCRAW v. State, 330 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)
  …is failure to demonstrate any significant prejudice negate his claim that the delay had an unconstitutional effect. Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. at 530, 92 S.Ct. at 2192, 33 L.Ed.2d at 117; King v. State, 303 So. 2d 389 (Fla.App. 3d, 1974), cert. den., 314 So. 2d 775 (Fla. 1975). McCraw was not denied the benefits of Rule 3.191, R.Cr.P., pertaining to speedy-trial, nor those of the Sixth Amendment, made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth Amendment. His conviction is Affirmed. McCORD, Acting C. J., and…

Authorities Cited

• Gershon S. Miller v. Goldman, 303 So. 2d 710 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
• Solomon v. Cnty. OF Dade, 303 So. 2d 710 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)