ROBERT COSTINE, APPELLANT,
v.
NGAERE COSTINE, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1973-08-10
Nos. 72-1030, 73-107 and 73-108
LILES, A. C. J., and HOBSON and BOARD MAN, JJ., concur.
281 So. 2d 217 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1973) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Oral argument is dispensed with pursuant to F.A.R. 3.10(e), 32 F.S.A., and the judgment is affirmed.

LILES, A. C. J., and HOBSON and BOARD MAN, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • F.A. Conner v. Trans AIR Supply Co., 426 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Ocala Foundry and Machine Works v. Lester, 49 Fla. 199, 38 So. 51 (1905); Fort Caroline Orchids, Inc. v. Guest, [*1063] 378 So. 2d 305 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Andrews v. Mother’s Auto Sales, Inc. 281 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); United States v. State 179 So. 2d 890, 893 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965).…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw