CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION CREATED AND EXISTING UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
M. JACK BREITBART AND DOROTHY BREITBART, HIS WIFE, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1973-06-26
No. 72-1011
Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.
280 So. 2d 18 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1973) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

In this second appeal of a zoning dispute, the Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed that the City of Miami Beach's RM-14 zoning classification of the Breitbarts' property was arbitrary and unconstitutional, but reversed and modified the trial court's judgment to the extent it prescribed specific permitted uses, which violated separation of powers principles.


Holding

The court held that the RM-14 zoning classification was arbitrary and unconstitutional and sufficiently supported by evidence. However, the trial court improperly invaded the legislative field by directing specific permitted uses in its judgment, violating separation of powers principles.


Headnotes

[1] A zoning classification is unconstitutional and void if it is arbitrary and unreasonable in its restriction of property use.

[2] A trial court impermissibly invades the legislative field when it directs a specific use to be allowed in a rezoning decision, violating the doctrine of separation of pow…

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“The provision of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami Beach, Florida, insofar as it restricts and limits the use of the above described land [by classification] RM-14 is arbitrary and unconstitutional and void.”

Trial court's finding that the zoning classification was invalid, which the appellate court affirmed as supported by sufficient evidence.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The Breitbarts owned property in Miami Beach surrounded by mixed-use development, including a Howard Johnson Hotel to the south, Mt. Sinai Hospital to…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is the second appearance of this zoning case before us. In City of Miami Beach v. Breit Bay, Inc., Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 354, we upheld a final decree enjoining the city from restricting the use of this property for single-family purposes. In our prior decision the property in question was described in the following manner: (190 So.2d at 355)

“The appellee’s property is ‘an island surrounded by roads.’ Directly to the west is the maze of highways that make up the cloverleaf, the terminus of the Julia Tuttle Expressway. Also to the west *19is the Mount Sinai Hospital property. To the south, in the same block, is an eight-story Howard Johnson Hotel or Motel and Restaurant. Also immediately south of this property is a raw concrete blockhouse that is a power station for the power company.
“To the east, on the other side of North Bay Road, are single-family residences which are located in another zoning classification. Southwest of the property is the west bound entrance approach for Julia Tuttle Causeway.”

Subsequent to our decision in the previous appeal, the city rezoned 1 the subject parcel RM-14 (multiple family low density city district) which permitted a maximum of fourteen units per acre and a maximum height of thirty feet. This classification of the property was challenged by appellees and resulted in an amended final judgment in their favor which stated, inter alia:

“The provision of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Miami Beach, Florida, insofar as it restricts and limits the use of the above described land [by clas-fication RM-14 is arbitrary and unconstitu-tutional and void.
“The City of Miami Beach is directed, in rezoning the property, not to restrict the use of the property in an arbitrary and unreasonable classification, and not to restrict the property so that it can not be used for professional office use and for motel use consistent with the character of the neighborhood which includes the Howard Johnson Motel to the South of the Breitbart property, and the Mt. Sinai Hospital Complex to the west of the Breitbart property.”

We have carefully considered the record, briefs and arguments of counsel in light of the controlling principles of law, and have concluded that there was sufficient evidence before the trial court to substantiate its finding that the zoning classification RM-14 is arbitrary and unconstitutional. See: Hammond v. Carlyon, Fla.1957, 96 So.2d 219; Tollius v. City of Miami, Fla.1957, 96 So.2d 122.

The second quoted paragraph of the judgment is an expression of the trial judge’s “legislative” intent upon the rezoning of the property. As such it directs that a certain use be allowed. By so doing, the trial court invaded the legislative field which is prohibited under the doctrine of separation of powers. See City of Miami Beach v. Weiss, Fla.1969, 217 So.2d 836; cf. City of South Miami v. Martin Brothers, Inc., Fla.App. 1969, 222 So.2d 775.

The judgment appealed from is hereby modified by eliminating therefrom the paragraph beginning “The City of Miami Beach is directed . . .” and ending . . . to the west of the Breitbart property.”, and by substituting therefore the following: “The City of Miami Beach is ordered to promptly reconsider the rezoning of the property in a manner not inconsistent with the decision of the circuit court and the opinion of the District Court of Appeal.”

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part and modified, and the cause is remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings as outlined.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • City OF Miami Beach v. Breitbart, 358 So. 2d 564 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
    …ble with reference to the Plaintiff’s property. (e) Costs shall be taxed against the Defendant.” Appellant contends: that the trial court’s order is contrary to the opinion and mandate of this court in the case of City of Miami Beach v. Breitbart, 280 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973) [hereinafter cited as Breit-bart]; that the trial court erred by declaring invalid a zoning ordinance which protected and promoted the health, safety, morals, and welfare of the community in relation to the use of property; and th…
  • Breitbart v. City OF Miami Beach, 286 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 1973)
    …Certiorari denied. 280 So. 2d 18. CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw