COMPANIA DOMINICANA DE AVIACION ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
CHARLES KNAPP, ETC., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1973-06-12
No. 72-1402
Before PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ., and MELVIN, WOODROW M., Associate Judge.
279 So. 2d 93 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1973)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the appellants failed to demonstrate reversible error in the record.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellants appealed a $600,000 judgment entered after a jury found them negligent in operating an airplane, causing the death of Clyde Knapp. Appellan…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
MELVIN, WOODROW M., Associate Judge.

MELVIN, WOODROW M., Associate Judge.

Appellants seek reversal of the judgment in the sum of $600,000.00 entered in the trial court. The judgment is based upon the verdict of the jury in the suit of Knapp for the death of his son, Clyde, the legal cause of which was the negligence of the appellants in the operation of their airplane.

Reversal is here urged because, so appellants claim, the plaintiff parents, Knapp, were compensated for the loss of Clyde by the verdict and judgment in the sum of $1,-800,000.00, affirmed by this court for the simultaneous death of their other son, Clifford, who lost his life in the same negligently produced disaster. Compania Dominicana de Aviacion v. Knapp, Fla.App.*941971, 251 So.2d 18. The record in the case cited clearly reveals that the verdict and judgment therein entered related solely to the son, Clifford. The pleadings were so cast, the case was so tried, argued, and the jury was so instructed. Likewise, the present case was so pleaded, and presented to the jury as to Clyde.

The appellants fail to demonstrate by the record error. Therefore, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw