COASTLINE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
EQUILEASE CORPORATION, A SUBSIDIARY OF ELTRA CORPORATION, A NEW YORK CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1973-06-12
No. 72-1202
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.
278 So. 2d 683 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1973) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon the rule stated in Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Fla.1970, 231 So.2d 193; Automatic Canteen Company of America v. Butler, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 712. As to appellant’s contention that the contract sued upon was one of guarantee, this point need not be decided by reason of the holding in Anderson v. Trade Winds Enterprises Corp., Fla.App. 1970, 241 So.2d 174.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • DeWITT v. Duce, 408 So. 2d 216 (Fla. 1981)
    …ohannon v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., 210 N.C. 679, 188 S.E. 390 (1936), in which plaintiff would inherit nothing through intestacy if he had succeeded in defeating a fraudulent will, which justified allowance of a remedy in tort. . Cooke v. Cooke, 278 So. 2d 683 (Fla.3d DCA 1973), is the only other Florida case in this area. Cooke is principally concerned with jury charges. The facts indicate, however, that a tort action was properly allowed since the plaintiff son had been promised two-thirds of his father…
  • Cooke v. Cooke, 293 So. 2d 703 (Fla. 1974)
    …ERVIN, Justice (dissenting): A review of the opinion of the District Court in this case, reported in 278 So. 2d 683, and the record proper discloses the trial judge improperly stated in his charge to the jury that verbal agreements to make a will are not valid. He qualified that statement by stating there was no claim in the case of a written agreement by the dec…
  • Richard and Eva Whalen v. Duane and Garnett Prosser, 719 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)
    …est to plaintiff would have been carried out but for wrongful acts of defendant). Kramer v. Freedman, 272 So. 2d 195 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973) (ruling that issue of interference [*5] had been litigated in prior proceedings to revoke will). Cooke v. Cooke, 278 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973) (discussing jury instructions used to explain the tort). Davison v. Feuerherd, 391 So. 2d 799 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980) (holding that plaintiff must prove to reasonable certainty that she would have been beneficiary of trust but for def…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw